• Home
  • History
  • Legal Practice and the Written Word in the Early Middle Ages: Frankish Formulae, c.500-1000 (Cambridge Studies in Medieval Life and Thought: Fourth Series)

Legal Practice and the Written Word in the Early Middle Ages: Frankish Formulae, c.500-1000 (Cambridge Studies in Medieval Life and Thought: Fourth Series)

By Alice Rio

Criminal formularies are books of version felony files compiled by means of early medieval scribes for his or her personal use and that in their students. an important resource for the historical past of early medieval Europe, they rfile social family members past the slim international of the political elite. Formularies provide a lot information about the lives of standard humans: revenues and presents of land, divorces, adoptions, and disputes over labour in addition to robbery, rape or homicide. beforehand, using formularies as a ancient resource has been hampered through serious methodological difficulties, particularly during the trouble of building an exact chronological or geographical context for them. through interpreting Frankish criminal formularies from the Merovingian and Carolingian classes, this publication presents a useful, targeted research of the issues and chances linked to formularies, and may be required examining for students of early medieval historical past.

Show description

Quick preview of Legal Practice and the Written Word in the Early Middle Ages: Frankish Formulae, c.500-1000 (Cambridge Studies in Medieval Life and Thought: Fourth Series) PDF

Show sample text content

As in lots of formularies, the gathering mixes company with excitement, and lots of of those version letters qualify as felony files, as with nos 18 and 19, conculcaturiae ensuring the ongoing unfastened prestige of a girl after her marriage to an unfree guy. 238 No. 15 is a letter of intercession for a guy who had fled to the security of the abbot; nos 7 and 23 officially announce the dying of a few priests. a few of these letters can have had extra normal worth than others as versions, as urged by way of the positive name of no.

Meyer (Berlin, 1905) Kölzer DM T. Kölzer, ed. , Die Urkunden der Merovinger, MGH Diplomata regum Francorum e stirpe merovingica (Hanover, 2001) MIÖG Mitteilung des Instituts für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung MGH Monumenta Germaniae Historica MGH Capitularia ed. A. Boretius, Capitularia regum Francorum, MGH Leges II, 2 vols (Hanover, 1883–97) MGH Formulae ed. okay. Zeumer, Formulae Merowingici et Karolini aevi, MGH Leges V (Hanover, 1886) NA Neues Archiv der Gesellschaft für ältere deutsche Geschichtskunde PL Patrologia Latina, ed.

6), however the Virgin used to be often known as co-patroness in a couple of St Gall files, so there's no contradiction. 247 The id with St Gall is additional supported through the point out of Grimald as abbot in no. 7 (Grimald used to be abbot of St Gall from 841 to 872). a few texts provide particular dates. No. 6 is dated to 30 March of the thirtyfirst yr of the reign of Louis (which may possibly simply have noted Louis the German, even though he's defined the following as ‘iunioris’), which might correspond to 870. This back issues to St Gall, due to the fact Louis the German used to be often called iunioris via 3 diversified scribes (including Notker) in St Gall records.

118 114 Catalogue of the collections incorporated in Warsaw BU 1 as no. forty four, which follows heavily the textual content of Marculf II, 35. The identify of no. forty eight doesn't fit any that we all know of; no. forty nine, the final indexed in Paris BnF lat. 10756, should have corresponded to no. 37 of the Warsaw manuscript (both are entitled ‘Donatio advert ecclesiam put up obitum’). 119 at least, either manuscripts convey that Marculf exerted a power at the excursions culture. numerous texts from the ‘core’ thirtythree excursions formulae additionally seem to borrow from Marculf: evaluate excursions nos 21 and 22 and Marculf II, eleven and II, 10, or excursions nos 27 and 33 and Marculf I, 33 and 37.

Excellent and fact in Frankish and Anglo-Saxon Society: reviews offered to J. M. Wallace-Hadrill (Oxford, 1983), 58–75, at pp. 68–9. 111  Zeumer, ‘Über die älteren fränkischen Formelsammlungen’, p. eighty, and MGH Formulae, p. 166. 109 one hundred ten 111 Inventory of the proof manuscript used to be sure. Bernhard Bischoff and Hubert Mordek recommended that Paris BnF lat. 4629 had initially been certain including Leiden BPL 114, which might provide a few aid to Zeumer’s organization of the 2 manuscripts within the Formulae Bituricenses, yet, even though it is hard to disagree with such eminent specialists, this hyperlink has been wondered lately.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.99 of 5 – based on 37 votes