Philosophers Behaving Badly

By Mel Thompson, Nigel Rodgers

An enticing and sometimes hilarious survey of the far-from-fusty extra-curricular actions of a few of philosophy’s most interesting practitioners
 
Philosophers Behaving Badly examines the lives of 8 nice philosophers—Rousseau, whose perspectives on schooling and the social order look apparently at odds together with his personal outrageous lifestyles; Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, giants of the nineteenth century whose phrases appear ever extra proper this present day; and 5 immensely influential philosophers of the twentieth century, Russell, Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Sartre, and Foucault.

Show description

Quick preview of Philosophers Behaving Badly PDF

Show sample text content

Fears that such insanity may turn out hereditary haunted Russell all his lifestyles. yet there have been governesses and tutors – he grew to become very connected to a couple of the previous – to whom he might speak extra freely, and Russell quickly published highbrow promise. while he used to be 11, Frank initiated him into the mysteries of arithmetic. Russell was once interested if upset that Frank gave no evidence for Euclid’s axioms, insisting they have to be taken with no consideration. even if, Russell had found a brand new global. ‘This was once one of many nice occasions of my lifestyles, as fabulous as old flame.

Definitely no thinker this day is extra renowned, even fashionable. His attractiveness now eclipses that of Marx and all different thinkers as books approximately his lifestyles and paintings cascade from the presses. As a lot psychologist as thinker, emphatically now not a procedure builder yet an aphorist, this highbrow tightrope walker (to borrow a favorite picture) boasted of overturning the tables of the legislations. particularly, he insisted on being a Ja-sagender, announcing certain to lifestyles, denying the life-deniers of not only the Judaeo-Christian culture yet of the Platonist, Buddhist and so much different traditions.

Wittgenstein’s instructing tools at Cambridge have been as unconventional as that they had been in Trattenbach. He not just didn't speak from notes – he looked notes as ‘corpse-like’ and hated his scholars taking any – he frequently didn't speak in any respect yet spent the hour of his seminars or lectures in self-torturing silence, his face screwed up awaiting the phrases to emerge The conscientiously selected few who attended those seminars – they have been by no means marketed within the general means – listened enraptured, seldom bold to talk.

Ostensibly approximately Genet, the ebook is actually approximately Sartre – Genet is simply the chance for an additional marathon of self-exploration and promoting. Genet himself admitted in 1964 that he felt stripped bare by way of Sartre’s ebook, and it ended in a interval of six years within which he felt nearly not able to proceed writing. but Sartre opened the ebook via an account of Genet’s worry of the gaze of the area. Sartre knew rather well the impression that such publicity may have on his topic – yet went forward and wrote it besides!

Having been privately tutored previous, Wittgenstein had now not realized the Latin required to go into a fitness center or grammar college. ) it's not likely, besides the fact that, that any fellow students guessed Wittgenstein used to be Jewish, for he used to be a Catholic and German in identify and visual appeal, being blue-eyed and blond-haired. yet Wittgenstein, mocked because the aloof posh child from Vienna, probably fell foul of Hitler, who used to be already revealing a genius for bullying. There are different similarities. Neither guy may well lengthy continue a midway equivalent dating, sexual or social, with one other person.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.57 of 5 – based on 42 votes