• Home
  • Marxism
  • Philosophy of the Encounter: Later Writings, 1978-1987

Philosophy of the Encounter: Later Writings, 1978-1987

By Louis Althusser


From Althusser's so much prolific interval, this publication is destined to develop into a classic.

In the overdue Seventies and Nineteen Eighties, Louis Althusser continued a interval of extreme psychological instability in which he murdered his spouse and used to be dedicated to a psychiatric health center. Spanning this deeply troubling interval, this fourth and ultimate quantity of political and philosophical writings finds Althusser wrestling in an inventive and unorthodox model with a complete sequence of theoretical difficulties to supply a few of his very most interesting paintings. In his profound exploration of questions of determinism and contingency, Althusser constructed a "philosophy of the encounter," which he hyperlinks to a hidden and subterranean culture within the historical past of Western concept which stretches from Epicurus via Spinoza and Machiavelli to Marx, Derrida and Heidegger.

Show description

Quick preview of Philosophy of the Encounter: Later Writings, 1978-1987 PDF

Show sample text content

Yet that, in Althusser's view, used to be the tribute he complex to the un-Marxist fable of the kingdom. type domination, he observed quickly thereafter, can't be shared. the explanation lies within the very nature of domination. Grounded in exploitation, the 'force above the legislations' on which the country runs, says Montesquieu, is a surplus of strength. This surplus measures the variation among the respective forces of 'power and poverty', among the violence of the exploiting periods, at the one hand, and that of the 'masses of the exploited' at the different.

Montesquieu names accomplices; 'The Underground present' unmasks their ringleader. it's the writer of the dialogue of the mercantile economic system in come upon the good query of the bourgeoisie'. Capital, the place 'we the following Marx forgets that he used to be the second one individual after Montesquieu to adopt to imagine background with out attributing to it an finish. He reverts to the ideology of the 1859 Preface, and, hence, the idea 'of a legendary "decay" of the feudal mode of construction and the delivery of the bourgeoisie out of the midst of this decay'.

During this point of view it's conveniently comprehensible that, through the type fight, we're, within the final example, by no means facing whatever except a contradiction inner to Hegemony, and that this final contradiction, which sums up all different struggles, can endure an intensive reversal [basculer] merely because of its trouble. it's all too visible that this inventive, ambiguous 'montage' might be construed to intend that Gramsci is speaking approximately category fight, in order that, at this point, the time period 'Hegemony' truly designates type domi­ state, that's to assert, what Marx and Lenin known as category dictatorship, both bourgeois or proletarian.

Zero/ the stumble upon 6 all. From which it follows that one should switch the order of one's options instead of the order of the realm .... Forgive me for confiding in you at such size, Merab. right here I preserve all this to myself; with you, it truly is one other topic. you are in my innovations. With all my affection, Louis Notes Althusser, The proof, the long run Lasts many years, sooner or later Lasts a protracted T! me and trans. Richard Veasey, London, 1994. 2 A quip of Andre Breton's. three For the complaints, see progressive Societies, Il Manifesto, ed.

Hostilities have been opened with Georges Marchais's January 1976 public confession that, in his 'personal opinion', speak of sophistication dictator­ send was once 'outmoded' in democracies reminiscent of glossy France. The PCF quickly came upon that it was once of a similar brain as its basic Secretary: its February Twenty-Second Congress duly authorized, by means of the standard unanimous vote, Marchais's advice that the get together statutes be purged of all point out of the belief. officially, execution of the modillcation used to be left to the Twenty-Third Congress.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.94 of 5 – based on 35 votes