• Home
  • Marxism
  • Theodor W. Adorno: An Introduction (Post-Contemporary Interventions)

Theodor W. Adorno: An Introduction (Post-Contemporary Interventions)

By Gerhard Schweppenhäuser

Theodor W. Adorno (1903–1969) was once one of many 20th century’s most crucial thinkers. In gentle of 2 pivotal developments—the upward thrust of fascism, which culminated within the Holocaust, and the standardization of pop culture as a commodity necessary to modern capitalism—Adorno sought to judge and synthesize the basic insights of Western philosophy via revisiting the moral and sociological arguments of his predecessors: Kant, Nietzsche, Hegel, and Marx. This ebook, first released in Germany in 1996, presents a succinct creation to Adorno’s not easy and far-reaching proposal. Gerhard Schweppenhäuser, a number one authority at the Frankfurt institution of severe idea, explains Adorno’s epistemology, social and political philosophy, aesthetics, and thought of culture.

After delivering a short assessment of Adorno’s lifestyles, Schweppenhäuser turns to the theorist’s middle philosophical innovations, together with post-Kantian critique, determinate negation, and the primacy of the item, in addition to his view of the Enlightenment as a code for international domination, his prognosis of contemporary mass tradition as a application of social keep an eye on, and his knowing of modernist aesthetics as a problem to conceive an alternate politics. alongside the way in which, Schweppenhäuser illuminates the works greatly thought of Adorno’s most crucial achievements: Minima Moralia, Dialectic of Enlightenment (co-authored with Horkheimer), and Negative Dialectics. Adorno wrote a lot of the 1st of those in the course of his years in California (1938–49), the place he lived close to Arnold Schoenberg and Thomas Mann, whom he assisted with the musical aesthetics on the middle of Mann’s novel Doctor Faustus.

Show description

Quick preview of Theodor W. Adorno: An Introduction (Post-Contemporary Interventions) PDF

Show sample text content

Even if Adorno didn't say so explicitly, he sincerely considered modernist beliefs similar to Le Corbusier’s suggestion of the home as a “machine for residing” as manifestations of a technocratic-instrumental rationality. Nor did Adorno suggest the comfy nonculture of selfindulgent suburbia. And Heidegger’s anti-urban version of the hut within the Black wooded area was once both out of the query. In Adorno’s opinion, it had develop into transparent that the functionalist insurrection opposed to decoration had become an “autonomous” aesthetic dogma.

Yet in contrast to Herbert Marcuse, for instance, he rejected all different types of actionism and violence simply because, in his view, they falsely provided themselves as progressive acts. For Adorno, they recalled the antidemocratic power of a few prefascist events. whilst, no longer lengthy earlier than his demise, Adorno spoke in a newspaper interview concerning the chances of a thorough democratic politics within the Federal Republic, he acknowledged, “The decisive element of distinction is that, less than present-day sociological and technical stipulations, transformative praxis is feasible merely as nonviolent and carried out in the framework of the fundamental legislation.

Adorno dies from a middle assault on August 6 in Visp, within the Swiss canton of Vallis.

The transcendental topic isn't passive, now not in simple terms receptive, yet consistently actively engaging within the creation of the realm that's the item of its cognition. yet what that international is in itself, the totality of fact autonomous of spatiotemporal and causal legislation, what defines its intelligible middle in contrast from its empirical character—that isn't definitely knowable. Kant’s philosophy therefore eludes the traps of conventional metaphysics and is ready to rehabilitate metaphysics as such. As Adorno places it, absolutely within the Kantian spirit, Metaphysics, in its essence, is composed now not of transparent dogmatic solutions, yet of questions….

Particularly, they provide exemplary portrayals of ways social reviews are expressed in aesthetic items, which, whereas by no means self-sufficient, may be independent as artistic endeavors. Löwenthal deems it the duty of literary stories, encouraged via sociology, heritage, economics, and social psychology, “to examine which particular social buildings locate expression within the person literary paintings, and what functionality the person paintings routines in society…. Questions of shape, either that of motif and that of subject material, needs to be opened within the related solution to the materialist standpoint.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.00 of 5 – based on 36 votes