• Home
  • Marxism
  • Following Marx: Method, Critique and Crisis (Historical Materialism Book Series)

Following Marx: Method, Critique and Crisis (Historical Materialism Book Series)

By Michael A. Lebowitz

What does it suggest to stick to Marx? during this exam of Marx’s method mixed with particular purposes on themes in political economic climate comparable to neo-Ricardian concept, analytical Marxism, the falling price of revenue, crisis-theory, monopoly-capital, advertisements, and the capitalist country, this quantity argues that the failure to appreciate (or the categorical rejection of) Marx’s approach has led off target many that give some thought to themselves Marxists.

About the writer Michael A. Lebowitz is professor emeritus of Economics at Simon Fraser collage. His e-book, Beyond ‘Capital': Marx's Political financial system of the operating Class was once offered the Deutscher Memorial Prize in 2004. His construct it Now: Socialism for the Twenty-first Century has been republished in different languages.

Show description

Quick preview of Following Marx: Method, Critique and Crisis (Historical Materialism Book Series) PDF

Show sample text content

Cf. Meek 1961 and Hunt and Sherman 1972. 20 • bankruptcy for far of the present critique of neo-classical conception. 6 equally, as Medio exhibits in a single of the Hunt/Schwartz volume’s most interesting essays, Sraffa supplied the foundation for an answer to the ‘transformation challenge’ which has haunted many Marxists. 7 The compliment of Marxists for the initiator of the demolition of the previous vulgar economic climate has consequently been well-taken. although, from a Marxist standpoint, there are severe issues of the Sraffa version.

Give some thought to the barrier of humans. it isn't designated to capitalist creation that development of effective forces may possibly, at some point soon, arise opposed to a barrier within the type of on hand provides of labour-power. less than given stipulations of creation, quickly starting to be construction will entail elevated labour requisites which, in the end, may well exhaust the present provide of labour. the place the stipulations of creation stay unchanged, the influence can be to examine the speed of development of construction (and hence additionally the expansion of labour specifications) till such time as raises within the offer of labour enable extra fast raises in creation.

103, 283, 291; Marx 1968, p. 500. Marx 1968, p. 514. Marx 1968, p. 497n. 124 • bankruptcy Seven Is there, then, no secular tendency for the speed of revenue to say no? we must always give some thought to even if, in its efforts to surpass the barrier of the falling expense of revenue, capital creates stipulations which result in an earthly decline within the cost of revenue, which rework the barrier right into a restrict. As Marx usually famous, one of many significant responses to the falling fee of revenue used to be an exertion of capital so that the person capitalists, via better tools, and so forth.

231. 754, 752; 1968, p. 18. 117–27. the overall and the categorical in Marx’s conception of concern • 141 the uncooked fabric could were enough for the outdated point of creation, it will likely be inadequate for the hot. . . . it's a case of overproduction of mounted capital . . . ’. 28 the autumn within the fee of revenue this is the direct results of capital’s thrust to extend. yet, there are significant changes among Ricardo and Marx. particularly, Marx rejected the concept the autumn within the price of revenue is the manufactured from diminishing productiveness resulting in a fall within the price of surplus-value.

28 • bankruptcy The social foundation of the neo-Ricardian critique As famous above, the most thrust of the neo-Ricardian critique of neoclassical economics has been to undermine the latter’s theoretical justification of the distribution of source of revenue and, specifically, the go back to the vendors of capital. through demolishing the theoretical credibility (if no longer the ideological credibility) of the marginal productiveness idea of distribution, neo-Ricardian idea has severed the hyperlink among the efficient contribution of capital items and the pecuniary go back to the proprietors of capital.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.02 of 5 – based on 4 votes