• Home
  • Phenomenology
  • Ricoeur on Time and Narrative: An Introduction to Temps et récit

Ricoeur on Time and Narrative: An Introduction to Temps et récit

By William C. Dowling

“The item of this book,” writes William C. Dowling in his preface, “is to make the main innovations of Paul Ricoeur’s Time and Narrative on hand to readers who may need felt bewildered by way of the twists and turns of its argument.” The resources of puzzlement are, he notes, many. For a few, it's Ricoeur’s famously oblique form of presentation, within which the polarities of argument and exegesis look so frequently and so all of sudden to have reversed themselves. For others, it's the striking highbrow diversity of Ricoeur’s argument, drawing on traditions as far away from one another as Heideggerian existentialism, French structuralism, and Anglo-American analytic philosophy. but underneath the labyrinthian floor of Ricoeur’s Temps et récit, Dowling unearths a unmarried prolonged argument that, notwithstanding constructed unsystematically, is intended to be understood in systematic terms.

Ricoeur on Time and Narrative presents that argument in transparent and concise phrases, in a fashion that may be enlightening either to readers new to Ricoeur and people who could have felt themselves adrift within the complexities of Temps et récit, Ricoeur’s final significant philosophical paintings. Dowling divides his dialogue into six chapters, all heavily concerned with particular arguments in Temps et récit: on mimesis, time, narrativity, semantics of motion, poetics of heritage, and poetics of fiction. also, Dowling presents a preface that lays out the French highbrow context of Ricoeur's philosophical technique. An appendix offers his English translation of a private interview within which Ricoeur, having accomplished Time and Narrative, looks again over his lengthy profession as an the world over popular thinker. Ricoeur on Time and Narrative communicates to readers the highbrow pleasure of following Ricoeur’s dismantling of tested theories and arguments—Aristotle and Augustine and Husserl on time, Frye and Greimas on narrative constitution, Arthur Danto and Louis O. Mink at the nature of historic explanation—while coming to work out how, lower than the strain of Ricoeur’s research, those rules are reconstituted and printed in a brand new set of relatives to 1 another.

"The scholarship in William C. Dowling's Ricoeur on Time and Narrative is impeccable; Dowling is aware Ricoeur within out. He highlights Ricoeur's most crucial arguments, offers them in a limpid, concise language, and hyperlinks them to the proper 19th- and twentieth-century philosophical advancements. Dowling's ebook offers us with a lucid, intelligible model of Ricoeur's significant paintings, one who can be of substantial importance to philosophers, historians, and literary theorists." —Thomas Pavel, Gordon J. Laing distinct provider Professor of French Literature, and the Committee on Social idea, collage of Chicago

"William C. Dowling's Ricoeur on Time and Narrative is a refined and remarkably well-sustained piece of labor. It presents a close advent to an incredible paintings of philosophy and narrative theory—already a substantial success, given the trouble of Ricoeur's textual content. notwithstanding, Dowling additionally indicates us, occasionally explicitly, occasionally easily during the approach he conducts his argument, why we should always trouble with Ricoeur—what we need to achieve from understanding him greater than we do, even if good we might imagine we all know him." —Michael wooden, Charles Barnwell Straut category of 1923 Professor of English and Comparative Literature, Princeton University 

Show description

Quick preview of Ricoeur on Time and Narrative: An Introduction to Temps et récit PDF

Show sample text content

And but, watching the unusual legislations of contradiction which obtains in all such circumstances, the time was once lengthy, whereas it flamed via so quick. A innovative tribunal within the capital, and 40 or fifty thousand progressive committees all around the land; . . . prisons gorged with those who had devoted no offence, and will receive no listening to; these items grew to become the status quo and nature of appointed issues, and historical utilization ahead of they have been many weeks outdated. four Mimesis   thirteen eventually, in A story of 2 towns, as in different fictional narratives, the continual use of the previous stressful broadcasts that the tale is entirely imaginary and that, as such, it constitutes an self reliant or selfcontained international.

And not using a narrative telos—that forward-straining pressure that hyperlinks every one occasion to the subsequent in the plot—there may be no tale. yet until occasions are relocating towards an end result already implicit in Poetics of heritage   eighty one their improvement, there might be no telos. this can be the matter Mink desires to resolve just by emphasizing that during old narrative the end result is by way of definition identified to the historian: “history isn't the writing, however the rewriting of reports. ” What underwrites the telos of historic plot, by means of an analogous token, is that occasions lead inevitably to this end: “the tale that begun with Hitler’s reoccupation of the Rhineland might finish, lower than ten years later, together with his suicide in a Berlin bunker, via Germany’s quit to the Allies.

The garden has been mowed, and each intermediate step within the chain of occasions needs to be understood as having been topic to a controlling purpose. components in von Wright’s research are specifically very important to Ricoeur. the 1st is that the “T” of von Wright’s pTq introduces a temporality wanted for teleological figuring out. For von Wright himself, T is just the atemporal marker of logical entailment, just like the then of “if A, then B. ” yet in a conception of action—this is what Ricoeur sees, and takes over into his personal theory—A can simply stick with B in time: “he pulled the wire, then the mower begun.

Dowling’s Ricoeur on Time and Narrative is impeccable; Dowling is aware Ricoeur within out. He highlights Ricoeur’s most crucial arguments, provides them in limpid, concise language, and hyperlinks them to the appropriate 19th- and twentieth-century philosophical advancements. Dowling’s ebook offers us with a lucid, intelligible model of Ricoeur’s significant paintings, person who might be of substantial value to philosophers, historians, and literary theorists. ” RICOEUR ON TIME AND NARRATIVE college of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, IN 46556 undpress.

Hence, statements made at this greater level—“Germany felt humiliated via the provisions of the Versailles Treaty,” “Germany had a good time on the reoccupation of the Rhineland as a vindication of nationwide honor”—remain solely significant even if they comprise any variety of person exceptions. there have been, as we all know, Germans who didn't think the provisions of the Versailles Treaty to be thoroughly unjust. there have been many that didn't celebrate on the reoccupation of the Rhineland. yet those contributors do not need dissented from the proposition that “Germany” felt humiliated, or that “Germany” had a good time.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.68 of 5 – based on 41 votes