• Home
  • Marxism
  • Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx's Critical Theory

Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx's Critical Theory

By Moishe Postone

During this formidable booklet, Moishe Postone undertakes a basic reinterpretation of Marx's mature serious conception. He calls into query a number of the presuppositions of conventional Marxist analyses and provides new interpretations of Marx's relevant arguments. those interpretations lead him to a truly assorted research of the character and difficulties of capitalism and supply the foundation for a critique of "actually latest socialism." based on this new interpretation, Marx identifies the significant middle of the capitalist approach with an impersonal type of social domination generated by means of hard work itself and never easily with marketplace mechanisms and personal estate. Proletarian hard work and the commercial creation technique are characterised as expressions of domination instead of as technique of human emancipation. This reformulation relates the shape of monetary progress and the constitution of social exertions in glossy society to the alienation and domination on the middle of capitalism. It offers the basis for a severe social concept that's extra enough to overdue twentieth-century capitalism.

Show description

Quick preview of Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx's Critical Theory PDF

Show sample text content

Korsch's process continues to be extra extrinsic: he seeks to set up a correlation among innovative classes and a extra holistic and radical social critique, and among nonrevolutionary sessions and a fragmented, extra educational and passive social critique (ibid. , pp. 56-67). Presuppositions of conventional Marxism seventy one been a valuable factor. The idea of the self-realization of the proletariat, dependent upon an confirmation of "labor" because the resource of social wealth, was once sufficient to the immediacy of that ancient context, as was once the comparable critique of the unfastened marketplace and personal possession.

This research of summary hard work offers an summary and preliminary logical decision for the improvement within the 20th century, famous by means of Andre Gorz and Daniel Bell, between others, of staff' self-conceptions as being worker/consumers instead of worker/producers. See Andre Gorz, Critique of monetary cause, trans. Gillian Handyside and Chris Turner (London and long island, 1989), p. 44ff. ; and Daniel Bell, "The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism," within the Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism (New York, 1978), pp.

Manhattan and London, 1956), p. 303. 28. For this argument, see Rudolf Schlesinger, Marx: His Time and Ours (London, 1950), pp. 9697. George Lichtheim indicates an analogous argument: "It is debatable that, in making use of a labourcost concept of price derived from primitive social stipulations to an monetary version belonging to a better degree, the classics have been to blame of complicated assorted degrees of abstraction'' {Marxism [2d ed. , long island and Washington, 1963], pp. 174-75). during this part, Lichtheim doesn't distinguish among "the classics" and Marx.

In different phrases, his critique is taken to be one basically inquisitive about demonstrating that exploitation is structurally intrinsic to capitalism. The presupposition that Marx's type of price is largely almost like Ricardo's implies additional that their conceptions of the hard work that constitutes price should also be essentially exact. the concept exertions is either the resource of all wealth and the viewpoint of a social critique is, as famous, general of bourgeois social critique. It dates at the very least way back to John Locke's writings and located its so much constant expression in Ricardo's political econ47.

E. , the positing of social labour within the kind of the contradiction of capital and salary labour—is the last word improvement of the price relation and of creation resting on price. " 27 The identify and preliminary sentence of this component of the Grundrisse point out that, for Marx, the class of worth expresses the fundamental kin of creation of capitalism—those social family that in particular represent capitalism as a method of social life—as good as that construction in capitalism relies on worth.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.82 of 5 – based on 3 votes