• Home
  • Marxism
  • Totalitarianism and Political Religion: An Intellectual History

Totalitarianism and Political Religion: An Intellectual History

By A. James Gregor

The totalitarian structures that arose within the 20th century offered themselves as secular. but, as A. James Gregor argues during this publication, they themselves functioned as religions. He provides an highbrow heritage of the increase of those political religions, tracing a collection of rules that come with trust definite textual content includes impeccable truths; notions of infallible, charismatic management; and the promise of human redemption via strict obedience, selfless sacrifice, overall commitment, and unremitting labor.

Gregor offers exact perception into the editions of Marxism, Fascism, and nationwide Socialism that ruled our speedy previous. He explores the seeds of totalitarianism as secular religion within the nineteenth-century ideologies of Ludwig Feuerbach, Moses Hess, Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Giuseppe Mazzini, and Richard Wagner. He follows the expansion of these seeds because the 20th century grew to become host to Leninism and Stalinism, Italian Fascism, and German nationwide Socialism—each a totalitarian establishment and a political religion.

Show description

Quick preview of Totalitarianism and Political Religion: An Intellectual History PDF

Show sample text content

P. . For a handy precis of the arguments surrounding the “religiosity” of early Marxism, see Heinz Röhr, Pseudoreligiöse rationale in den frühschriften von Karl Marx (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, ). ninety chap ter 4 Leninism Revolution as faith [In the 19th and early 20th centuries] socialism . . . introduced its purpose of changing into the faith for the hot humanity, and its intrinsic hyperlink to faith can't be doubted. . . . it's a entire dogma, an answer to the query of the that means of lifestyles, the aim of historical past.

By means of , Gentile conceived Mazzini because the harbinger of a collectivistic, in18 Gentile, Discorsi di religione, p. . Gentile had already made his case in regards to the immanence of the kingdom within the person in  in chap.  of his Fondamenti della filosofia del diritto. 19 Ibid. , pp. , , . 20 See the dialogue of Mazzini’s perspectives on self-sacrifice in Gentile, “Andrea Towianski,” in Il modernismo e i rapporti fra religone e filosofia, pp. –. one hundred fifty fascism dustrializing, antisocialist, innovative country that might remake the state.

Sixty one See Hegel’s “Lectures at the Proofs of the life of God,” ibid. , vol. , pp. –. sixty two See ibid. , vol. l, half l, c,, pp. –. fifty six fifty seven 2 four int ro duc t ion Hegel, the figurative suggestions of “God” and “infinity” confirm anything of the character of absolutely the all of us sense—however dimly. sixty three Hegel engages his viewers in an company calculated to bare anything of absolutely the that governs all issues. on the very graduation of his dialogue of common heritage, Hegel argued that during order to return to understand something of absolutely the, one at the least needs to first figure “the summary features of the character of Spirit”; that will be via an account of the “means Spirit makes use of which will discover its Idea”; and eventually, he may converse of that “shape which the fitting embodiment of Spirit assumes—the country.

60 See the dialogue in Gregor, Mussolini’s Intellectuals, chap. . fifty seven fifty eight 164 fascism which all regular “realities” have been absorbed. by means of the tip of , Mussolini was once ready to talk in Gentilean phrases—and by the point of the March on Rome in October , he referred to Giovanni Gentile as his “teacher. ”61 presently thereafter, Mussolini invited Gentile to affix his cupboard as Minister of Public schooling. In might , Gentile made formal program for club within the Partito nazionale fascista, and in November of that yr he grew to become Senator of the area.

They argue that personal estate is a singularly confident function of life’s situations; it's the desire of humankind, an extension of self, an inalienable correct. actually, Engels argues, it's the very life of that “inalienable correct” that makes of the earth a cursed construction. specialist economists fail to appreciate any of that. Engels informs them that it truly is inner most estate that condemns thousands to penury, to be denied all wish of possessing estate as their inalienable correct. For Engels, that used to be the principal contradiction of the trendy international.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.76 of 5 – based on 46 votes